Peter Beasley wrote:Has anyone discussed why 'Ricochet' was overdubbed onto the Coventry Cathedral film?
If my memory serves me correctly, the reason given at the time was the original audio recording had been stolen.
I do wonder though if Virgin/TD/Tony Palmer thought that the original audio was not interesting enough for the masses, especially compared to the polyrhythmic layering of 'Ricochet' and so decided to treat the Coventry TV broadcast as a promotion for 'Ricochet'.
It's sad that some fans have bought the Coventry Cathedral DVD thinking they are going to hear the concert's original audio and sadder still that some fans actually think it's TD performing 'Ricochet' live!
Never read about the recordings being stolen Peter, the version I heard was the sound was messed up, whatever story is correct it still wouldn't help as what is on the Coventry DVD is of course just a few selected shots from the gig (many are repeated) and therefore even if you had the 'original' sound element it would have nothing to be in sync with. I was offerred the original film last year, but turned it down, after all what would you do with film that's sat in a can since 1975? (I was also offered a film of TD recording Rubycon, but sadly that was just 5 minutes long...if it was longer I would have been very tempted to make an offer).
However I have seen a small section of the film with the original audio intact (might have been on another one of Tony Palmer's programmes?)
I'm always amazed when people say they are 'shocked' or 'ripped off' when they bought the DVD and found TD weren't actually playing Ricochet at the Cathedral, it's been covered hundreds of times before..but then again most people have better things to do than post on forums
.