Page 3 of 4

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:50 pm
by 24db
Oh man, you are just gonna love some of the reviews coming up ;) you won't believe it....just jaw dropping

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:52 pm
by bigmoog
I have been working rilly hard all afternoone on a new BM scoring system for Virgin Years TD.

Thus it works like this, where Phaedra is TWO VIRGINS


Phaedra: see above

Rubycon: 2 V

Ricochet: 2 V

STRATOSFEAR: 2 Zs*

Encore: 2V

Sorceror: (not a virgin)


*Zs as in BMs Zeitian scoring system

you will note, that its impossible to find one better than the other...as it depends

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:52 pm
by Hobo
epsilon75 wrote:Have to say Mick i have been surprised by some of the reactions toward the outstanding Stratosfear.................but i suppose if we all liked the same thing it would be a boring world................I used to convince myself it was impossible for anyone to dislike Rubycon :shock: obviously that is not the case :lol: :lol: :lol:
I find it very interesting to hear these opposing views Colin. Even those of us that like a particular album, will like it for differing reasons. That's what makes music great and with TD's vast output, there will be many more opinios to debate.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:53 pm
by 24db
bigmoog wrote:I have been working rilly hard all afternoone on a new BM scoring system for Virgin Years TD.

Thus it works like this, where Phaedra is TWO VIRGINS


Phaedra: see above

Rubycon: 2 V

Ricochet: 2 V

STRATOSFEAR: 2 Zs*

Encore: 2V

Sorceror: (not a virgin)


*Zs as in BMs Zeitian scoring system

you will note, that its impossible to find one better than the other...as it depends
er I think a re-think is needed, either that or some beer ;)

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:57 pm
by Hobo
24db wrote:
bigmoog wrote:I have been working rilly hard all afternoone on a new BM scoring system for Virgin Years TD.

Thus it works like this, where Phaedra is TWO VIRGINS


Phaedra: see above

Rubycon: 2 V

Ricochet: 2 V

STRATOSFEAR: 2 Zs*

Encore: 2V

Sorceror: (not a virgin)


*Zs as in BMs Zeitian scoring system

you will note, that its impossible to find one better than the other...as it depends
er I think a re-think is needed, either that or some beer ;)
Dr. Hobo prescribes plenty of Valium and a long, lie down.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:05 pm
by bigmoog
thats better, I have had my shot of jelly


ahem...any way friends, for him the BM, its just impossible to rate TD music in a quantifiable way....all I know is the vast majority of TD music takes me to a place I would rather stay.


:arrow: :wink: :idea:

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:08 pm
by 24db
bigmoog wrote:thats better, I have had my shot of jelly


ahem...any way friends, for him the BM, its just impossible to rate TD music in a quantifiable way....all I know is the vast majority of TD music takes me to a place I would rather stay.


:arrow: :wink: :idea:
All rating and reviews are pointless.
I rated your post as 4.7 out of 6.991, could do better, but an improvement over last years uneven output. ;)

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:11 pm
by bigmoog
24db wrote:
bigmoog wrote:thats better, I have had my shot of jelly


ahem...any way friends, for him the BM, its just impossible to rate TD music in a quantifiable way....all I know is the vast majority of TD music takes me to a place I would rather stay.


:arrow: :wink: :idea:
All rating and reviews are pointless.
I rated your post as 4.7 out of 6.991, could do better, but an improvement over last years uneven output. ;)

BM leaves this forum to research meaning of 'uneven output'*


*werent they a Krautrock band on Metronome?

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:13 pm
by Chris Monk
24db wrote:
bigmoog wrote:thats better, I have had my shot of jelly


ahem...any way friends, for him the BM, its just impossible to rate TD music in a quantifiable way....all I know is the vast majority of TD music takes me to a place I would rather stay.


:arrow: :wink: :idea:
All rating and reviews are pointless.
I rated your post as 4.7 out of 6.991, could do better, but an improvement over last years uneven output. ;)
I personally prefer his earlier work, before the Seagull left. This really is just a reworking of his earlier output, should we call it moogerising. :wink:

C-
Must try harder.

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:01 pm
by 24db
bigmoog wrote:
24db wrote:
bigmoog wrote:thats better, I have had my shot of jelly


ahem...any way friends, for him the BM, its just impossible to rate TD music in a quantifiable way....all I know is the vast majority of TD music takes me to a place I would rather stay.


:arrow: :wink: :idea:
All rating and reviews are pointless.
I rated your post as 4.7 out of 6.991, could do better, but an improvement over last years uneven output. ;)

BM leaves this forum to research meaning of 'uneven output'*
your doctor would recommend a high fibre diet :D

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:43 pm
by epsilon75
bigmoog wrote:I have been working rilly hard all afternoone on a new BM scoring system for Virgin Years TD.

Thus it works like this, where Phaedra is TWO VIRGINS


Phaedra: see above

Rubycon: 2 V

Ricochet: 2 V

STRATOSFEAR: 2 Zs*

Encore: 2V

Sorceror: (not a virgin)


*Zs as in BMs Zeitian scoring system

you will note, that its impossible to find one better than the other...as it depends


Broadmoor Beckons :shock: :o :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:29 pm
by bigmoog
:D ...BM was refused entry to Broadmoor ('too mad')



stratosfear is 4 tracks of stunning beauty :arrow:

Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:43 am
by 24db
bigmoog wrote::D ...BM was refused entry to Broadmoor ('too mad')
it was all those LPs you brought with you that put them off ;)

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:47 am
by 24db
TD needs to delete some of this spam

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:56 pm
by 24db
not sure about nice, you're a knob nevertheless