Snap! Ye gods, his braces and underpant elastic have both failed at the same time. Ah, Peter mon mate. Good try but I'm afraid I must raise two fingers and invoke the wrong type of snow on the tracks to mitigate the effectiveness of your Red Train move.redziller wrote:That's a might strong hand, I'll raise two thumbs and a toe
also raises right leg, peruses timetable for departure of Red Train
Snap!
Checkmate, mate, and Spon, mate.
Leaves for the swamp near Okefenokee to buy sennapods which give you a good run for your money
Although your conclusion is faultless, I must point out that the self-adjoint of H and P is random according to the weather. It is well known that in colder climes the HP gets stuck in the bottle unless shaken violently, which then causes unfortunate stains on the tablecloth and a random and non linear distribution (of what was once densely defined contents that then returned to an almost liquid state) on the chips.bigmoog wrote:The fact the decay can be slowed or even prevented by frequently repeated measurements, noticed first by Beskow and Nilsson, and called quantum Zeno effect by Misra and Sudarshan, attracted recently a lot of attention since it seems to be nowadays experimentally accessible. Mathematically the issue was addressed, in particular, long time ago by Friedman and Chernoff, however, the question about existence of the "Zeno limit" remained open.
Let H and P be a non-negative self-adjoint operator acting in a separable Hilbert space H and an orthogonal projection on H, respectively. Suppose that the operator HP := (H1/2P)*(H1/2P) is densely defined, then we claim that the said limit exists and we find its value,
limn→∞ [P exp(-iεtH/n)P]n = exp(-iεtHP) P
for ε=±1. In fact, the proof given in [1] yields a stronger result with P on the left-hand side replaced by values of a projection-valued family such that P(t)→P as t→0 and P(t)P = P(t), as well as non-symmetric versions of such formulae. The method we use employs a modification of a Kato's result on Trotter product formula in combination with analyic continuation.
As an example consider H=-Δ in L2(Rd) and P projecting onto an open Ω⊂Rd with a smooth boundary. Then the limits exists and HP is equal to the Dirichlet Laplacian in L2(Ω); this provided a rigorous proof of the formal claim made recently in [2] using the method of stationary phase.
Thus Zeit RULES
KING BM, PhD, etc CONCURS
In support of this may I quote the famous Eccles who when asked if he'd heard of a water shute said, "No, but I've heard of a piece of knotted string."