This has got to be THE worst ever thread in the history of TD forums.bigmoog wrote:comments?
bigmoog wrote:The space/time continuum is a collection of parametric specifications that attempt to define is. The specifications can be as single values and thus define a specific point in space/time, or they can be continuous and define an entire entity.
thus the TDn, is such a specification, where random voltage controlled oscillators controlled by human agency, produce improvised** td, when 'n' is a value to be noted by 0 where T is 0, therefore 1967 can be infinite and random
**by improvised, I mean collectively a roll of a dice, loaded of course, but still non linear,as the outcome is only hindsight
BM: existing microsecond to microsecond
comments?
Jacob - it's not the winning , it's the taking apartPertou wrote:You just don't understand my language! Ha, I won!
redziller wrote:bigmoog wrote:The space/time continuum is a collection of parametric specifications that attempt to define is. The specifications can be as single values and thus define a specific point in space/time, or they can be continuous and define an entire entity.
thus the TDn, is such a specification, where random voltage controlled oscillators controlled by human agency, produce improvised** td, when 'n' is a value to be noted by 0 where T is 0, therefore 1967 can be infinite and random
**by improvised, I mean collectively a roll of a dice, loaded of course, but still non linear,as the outcome is only hindsight
BM: existing microsecond to microsecond
comments?
Are you quite sure? The continuum is a form representing reality? Isn't the continuum the reality or, is the is, in your parlance?
And if the outcome is hindsight then is the was what the is was or was the is what that was is?
BM: possibly existing in the planck times between useconds - possibly not
drew attention to it...bigmoog wrote:eff this
im concerned viz a viz thee locked thread in members and guests
the obvious Q - which are you?Pertou wrote:Just as an additional source of strength may select one
response from a group of responses otherwise all equally
strong, so a sort of "negative selection" may arise from the
strength of behavior which is incompatible with one
response in a group.